From Maritime Monopoly to Agrarian Control
Colonial Expansion and the Formation of Modern Indonesian Agrarian Structures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25157/jamasan.v2i2.5947Keywords:
Colonial Maritime Expansion, Agrarian Transformation, Maritime Power, Colonialism, Indonesian Agrarian Structure, Global CapitalismAbstract
This article examines how colonial maritime expansion shaped the formation of modern agrarian structures in Indonesia between the sixteenth and early twentieth centuries. Existing historiography—including works by Van Niel (1992) on the Cultivation System, Elson (1994) on peasant Java, and Booth (1998) on colonial economic policies—has largely treated maritime colonialism and agrarian transformation as separate processes. This study argues that colonial control over maritime trade routes functioned as a central mechanism for restructuring agrarian relations, land ownership, and commodity production in the Indonesian archipelago. Using the historical method through literature review and published archival studies, the article demonstrates that the dominance of the Portuguese, the Dutch VOC, and the Dutch East Indies government integrated local agrarian regions into the global capitalist economy through monopolistic trade networks and export-oriented agricultural policies, including the Cultivation System (1830) and the Agrarian Law of 1870. The study contributes to Indonesian colonial historiography by highlighting the interconnected causal relationship between maritime power and agrarian restructuring, showing that modern agrarian inequalities in Indonesia cannot be separated from colonial maritime domination.
References
Afnatasia, J., Tungkup, L., Sianturi, F. R., Santika, L., & Sanjaya, P. S. (2024). Kebijakan ekspansi VOC dari perdagangan rempah hingga kolonialisme. Journal of Social Science Research, 4(5), 8755–8760. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/download/15933/10826/27291
Al Syahrin, M. N. (2018). Kebijakan poros maritim Jokowi dan sinergitas strategi ekonomi dan keamanan laut Indonesia. Indonesian Perspective, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14710/ip.v0i0.20175
Booth, A. (1998). The Indonesian Economy in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries: A History of Missed Opportunities. Macmillan.
Elson, R. E. (1994). Village Java under the Cultivation System, 1830–1870. Allen & Unwin.
Fahmi, R. F. M., Nurholis, E., Rahayu, T. K., Meilani, R., Apriliani, A., & Ramadhan, A. A. (2025). Dinamika kehidupan nelayan Pangandaran 1970–2012: Transformasi sosial ekonomi dalam konteks negara maritim. Jurnal Artefak, 12(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.25157/ja.v12i1.17979
Fitnawati WN, S., Ferisa Rini, R., & Fauzan, A. (2024). Kebijakan pengaturan agraria di Indonesia: Suatu tinjauan berdasarkan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria. Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH), 2(1), 298–309. https://journal.unisan.ac.id/index.php/JBH/article/view/108
Hall, K. R. (2019). Maritime trade and state development in early Southeast Asia. University of Hawaii Press. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb31047.0001.001
Harkantiningsih, N., & Nasional, P. A. (2014). Kebijakan maritim di Hindia Belanda. 4, 67–80.
Hasanah, A. U., Fahmi, R. F. M., Andiatna, N. B., Rahmawati, S., & Komala, D. Z. (2026). Pengakuan Hak Ulayat Tanah Baduy dalam Lintasan Sejarah: Kolonialisme (Agrarische Wet) Menuju Kebijakan Perda. Jurnal Artefak, 13(1), 69-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/ja.v13i1.22439
Heller, M. (2023). Rethinking Historical Methods in Organization Studies: Organizational Source Criticism. Organization Studies, 44(6), 987-1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231156978
Kartubi, H. M. E. I. (2024). Mengembalikan Natuna sebagai pusat poros maritim dunia: Tinjauan ekonomi dan perdagangan serantau. Jurnal Segeram, 3(1).
Kurniawan, H. (2015). Dampak sistem tanam paksa terhadap dinamika perekonomian petani Jawa 1830–1870. SOCIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 11(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.21831/socia.v11i2.5301
Mulya, L. (2018). Kebijakan maritim di Hindia Belanda: Langkah komersil pemerintah kolonial. MOZAIK: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/moz.v7i1.5543
Nikmah, I. (2024). Sejarah dan perkembangan hukum agraria di Indonesia dari kolonial hingga modern.
Orser Jr, C. E. (2016). Historical archaeology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647128
Pamungkas, S. C. (2021). Transformasi UU Agraria Tahun 1870 ke UUPA 1960 pada masa dekolonisasi kepemilikan tanah pasca kemerdekaan di Indonesia. Al-Isnad: Journal of Islamic Civilization History and Humanities, 2(2), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.22515/isnad.v2i2.4854
Purwanto, B. (2015). Perkembangan industri maritim Nusantara (Kenyataan dan harapan). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 4(2), 167–177. https://jurnal.um-palembang.ac.id/ilmu_manajemen/article/view/300
Rachman, N. F. (2017). Petani & penguasa: Dinamika perjalanan politik agraria Indonesia. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=CWXjDwAAQBAJ
Reid, A. (1993). Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1450–1680: Vol. 2, Expansion and Crisis. Yale University Press.
Rinardi, H., & Rochwulaningsih, Y. (2020). Inter-islands dynamic economy: Colonial policy on the Indonesian ports development for international and domestic shipping during colonial times. Journal of Maritime Studies and National Integration, 4(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.14710/jmsni.v4i1.7899
Sager, F., & Rosser, C. (2015). Historical methods. In Routledge handbook of interpretive political science (pp. 199-210). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315725314
Sakti Pratama, R., Bima Saputra, D., Haryanti, D., & Endri, E. (2024). Tinjauan terhadap hukum agraria maritim: Sumber daya alam. KONSENSUS: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(4), 56–67.
Simanullang, Y. S., Butar Butar, J. A., Simanjuntak, M., Pakpahan, D. br, Hutasoit, S. M., & Purnamasari, I. (2024). Dinamika perubahan sosial dalam masyarakat agraris. JIIC: Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 1(8), 4108–4117.
Siregar, A. A. (2024). Historical trace of the spice road as an economic center Indonesian trade and cultural heritage. Jurnal Pamator: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo, 17(4), 667–674. https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v17i4.28632
Stoianovich, T. (2019). French historical method: the Annales paradigm. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501744860
Suardi, S., Amir, A., & Mappangara, S. (2022). Kebijakan agraria kolonial dan dampaknya terhadap masyarakat Indonesia. Fajar Historia: Jurnal Ilmu Sejarah dan Pendidikan, 7(1), 77–93.
Tosh, J. (2018). The pursuit of history: Aims, methods and new directions in the study of history. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315728131
Van Leur, J. C. (2025). Indonesian trade and society: Essays in Asian social and economic history. Brill. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/isbn/9789004643314/html
Van Niel, R. (1992). Java's Northeast Coast 1740–1840: A Study in Colonial Encroachment and Dominance. CNWS Publications.
Widyatantri, T. D. (2025). Perkembangan maritim Nusantara yang menjadi awal dari kegiatan perdagangan di wilayah Banten. JPIM: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Multidisipliner, 2(2), 326–334.
Wiradi, G. (2000). Reforma agraria: Perjalanan yang belum berakhir.
Wills Jr, J. E. (1993). Maritime Asia, 1500-1800: the interactive emergence of european domination. The American Historical Review, 98(1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/2166383
Wulan Sondarika. (2015). Dampak Cultuurstelsel (tanam paksa) bagi masyarakat Indonesia dari tahun 1830–1870. Jurnal Artefak, 3, 59–72.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JAMASAN: Jurnal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles published in JAMASAN: Journal of History Education Students are licensed under:
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
This license allows readers and users to:
-
Copy, distribute, display, and adapt the work.
-
Use the work for any purpose, including commercial use.
Under the following conditions:
-
Attribution – Users must give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the journal, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
-
No additional restrictions – Users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Copyright remains with the author(s), while the journal retains the right of first publication.