PERAN KYAI DALAM PERGESERAN PERILAKU POLITIK MASSA NU DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS PADA PEMILIHAN PRESIDEN 2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v12i2.5957Abstract
This study aims to analyze the shift in the political behavior of Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) members in Banyumas Regency during the 2024 Presidential Election and to examine the role of kyai in this process. This research is motivated by the fragmentation of political preferences among NU members in the 2024 presidential election, indicating that political support was no longer consolidated toward a single political force. This study employed a qualitative method with a case study approach. Data were collected through literature review, in-depth interviews, and observations involving kyai, santri, and NU members in Banyumas Regency. Data analysis used the interactive analysis model of Miles and Huberman, which includes data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings show that the political preferences of NU members in Banyumas tend to be fragmented and are no longer fully determined by organizational affiliation. The role of kyai remains relevant as charismatic figures; however, their role has shifted from determinant actors to actors who merely influence political preferences. This influence is also associated with political signaling from the Central Board of Nahdlatul Ulama (PBNU), which is interpreted differently by NU members at the local level. In addition, the relatively egalitarian socio-cultural characteristics of Banyumas society, along with the increasing rational considerations of voters, contribute to the weakening of kyai’s determinative role in shaping political choices. These findings demonstrate the novelty that religious authority is no longer dominant in determining political behavior, but rather operates contextually and interacts with rational factors as well as local political dynamics.
References
Abd. Rahman Mas’ud. (2015). Kontribusi NU Sebagai Civil Society. 38(1).
Agung, S. (2013). Pergeseran Prilaku Politik Elit dalam Proses dan Pasca Pemilukada Kota Tasikmalaya 2012. Jurnal Ilmu Politik Dan Pemerintahan, 1(3), 294–309.
Anam, C. (1999). Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan Nahdlatul Ulama. Bima Satu Printing.
Arikunto, S. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Pustaka Pelajar.
Dinda Luthfiaturrahmah Alhaq, S. (2025). Transformasi Gerakan Dakwah Nahdlatul Ulama ( Nu ): Dari Tradisional Ke Modern Di Era Digital Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Dan Pendidikan. 02(03), 973–979.
Effendy, B. (2000). Repolitisasi Islam: Pernahkah Islam Berhenti Berpolitik? Mizan.
Febrina, R. H., Mustika, B. U., & Dedees, A. R. (2016). Nahdlatul Ulama: Bebas untuk Oportunis? Menelisik Kontestasi Politik pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Banyumas Periode 2008 dan 2013. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 18(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.13131
Indonesia, C. (2023). Survei LSI Denny JA: PDIP Jadi Partai Favorit Pemilih NU, PKB Ketiga. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20230904131013-617-994482/survei-lsi-denny-ja-pdip-jadi-partai-favorit-pemilih-nu-pkb-ketiga
Jasmaludin, S. S. (2025). Pemikiran Pembaharuan Muhammadiyah dan Nahdlatul Ulama ( NU ). 2(1), 70–80.
Majid, M. N. (2023). Dinamika Kiai dalam Politik Islam di Indonesia. 04(01), 1–18.
Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, J. S. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Muhtadi, A. S. (2004). Komunikasi Politik Nahdlatul Ulama: Pergulatan Pemikiran Politik Radikal dan Akomodatif. LP3ES.
Nasir, N. (2015). Kyai Dan Islam Dalam Mempengaruhi Perilaku Memilih Masyarakat Kota Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 6(2), 26–49.
Noor, M. (2019). Gaya Kepemimpinan Kyai. Jurnal Kependidikan, 7(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v7i1.2958
Oepen, M & Karcher, W. (1988). The Impact of Pesantren: in Education and Community Development in Indonesia. Collaboration Friedrich-Naumann Stiftung, Indonesian Society for Pesantren Community Development (P3M), and Technical University Berlin.
Pasolog, H. (2010). Teori Administrasi Publik. Alfabeta.
Roth, D. (2003). Studi Pemilu Empiris: Sumber, Teori-teori, dan Metode, (terj). Friedrich NaumannStiftung-Fur die Friheit.
Sulistiyani, A. T. (2008). Kepemimpinan Profesional; Pendekatan Leadership Game (Gava Media (ed.)).
Syarifudin, E. (2004). Teori Kepemimpinan. Alqalam, 21(102), 459. https://doi.org/10.32678/alqalam.v21i102.1644
Triono, A. L. (2023). Survei SMRC: 40 Juta Anggota NU Jadi Pemilih di Pilpres 2024. https://www.nu.or.id/nasional/survei-smrc-40-juta-anggota-nu-jadi-pemilih-di-pilpres-2024-uqHiN
Wahid, S. (2002). Menggagas Peran Politik NU. Pustaka Indonesia Satu.
Wahjosumidjo. (1987). Kepemimpinan dan Motivasi. Ghalia Indonesia.
Zakiah, L. (2015). Kepercayaan Santri Pada Kiai. Buletin Psikologi, 12(1), 33–43.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Chanifia Izza Millata, Khairurrizqo, Titis Perdani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Moderat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan © 2023 by Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

















