RESPONSE OF ASIAN COUNTRIES TO THE WIDESPREAD OF DUAL CITIZENSHIP POLICIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v10i4.4462Keywords:
state, citizen, law, politics, dual citizenshipAbstract
Citizens are an element of the existence of a country, so that citizens are an important factor in the sustainability of a country. In the modern era, where people have high mobility to travel and even live abroad, marriages from different countries are increasingly massive, which encourages the birth of children from parents from different countries. This condition gives rise to various challenges in determining the legal status of citizenship, one of which is giving rise to political decisions to recognize dual citizenship. Politically, dual citizenship is a very dilemmatic political decision for Asian countries which have historically experienced a period of colonialism, economic activities that are still dependent on the West, and strong nationalism, making the political decision to implement dual citizenship variously contradictory. The aim of this research is to reveal the response of countries in Asia to the widespread political decisions regarding dual citizenship. This article uses literature studies sourced from various studies related to dual citizenship, especially in Asian countries. The research results show that it is more difficult for countries in Asia to accept dual citizenship due to historical, economic and nationalistic aspects, as well as other aspects that show differences with countries in Europe, America and Africa. Countries in Asia have not fully responded well to the spread of dual citizenship, so dual citizenship is still an issue that is fought for by the diaspora and faces opposition from local communities.
References
Adrian, F., Miriam, F., & Michael, P. S. (2017). The human face of global mobility: A research agenda. The human face of global mobility, 1-25.
Alarian, H. M., & Goodman, S. W. (2017). Dual citizenship allowance and migration flow: An origin story. Comparative Political Studies, 50(1), 133-167.
Benhabib, S. (2017). Citizens, residents, and aliens in a changing world: Political membership in the global era. In Citizenship Rights (pp. 147-182). Routledge.
Christiano, T. (2018). The rule of the many: Fundamental issues in democratic theory. Routledge.
Eudo Citizenship Observatory. (2017). Country Profiles. http://eudo-citizenship.eu/country-profiles.
Faist, T., Gerdes, J., & Rieple, B. (2004). Dual citizenship as a path-dependent process. International Migration Review, 38, 913-944.
Folger, J. (2023, April 11). Dual Citizenship Advantages and Disadvantages. https://shorturl.at/dhJM2
Fraser, N. (1996). Social Justice in The Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation: Stanford University.
Fuchs, D., & Roller, E. (2018). Conceptualizing and measuring the quality of democracy: the citizens’ perspective. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 22-32.
Harpaz, Y., & Mateos, P. (2019). Strategic citizenship: Negotiating membership in the age of dual nationality. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(6), 843-857.
Hermanto, B. (2022). Reformulasi Undang-Undang Kewarganegaraan Indonesia: Perspektif Politik Hukum, Problematik, dan Prospek Pengaturan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(2), 209-230.
Howard, M. M. (2005). Variation in dual citizenship policies in the countries of the EU. International Migration Review, 39, 697-720.
Isin, E. F. & Wood, P. K. (1999). Citizenship & Identity. London: Sage.
Isin, E. F., & Turner, B. S. (2007). Investigating citizenship: An agenda for citizenship studies. Citizenship studies, 11(1), 5-17.
Kim, J. (2019). ‘Ethnic capital’and ‘flexible citizenship’in unfavourable legal contexts: stepwise migration of the Korean Chinese within and beyond northeast Asia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(6), 939-957.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (2002). Teaching the Library Research Process. Scarecrow Press.
Mansoor, M. (2021). Citizens' trust in government as a function of good governance and government agency's provision of quality information on social media during COVID-19. Government information quarterly, 38(4), 101597.
Mateos, P. (2019). The mestizo nation unbound: dual citizenship of Euro-Mexicans and US-Mexicans. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(6), 917-938.
Mau, S., Gülzau, F., Laube, L., & Zaun, N. (2015). The global mobility divide: How visa policies have evolved over time. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(8), 1192-1213.
Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, Higher Education and The Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313-345.
Poethig, K. (2006). Sitting Between Two Chairs: Cambodia’s Dual Citizenship Debate 3 4. In Expressions of Cambodia (pp. 89-101). Routledge.
Sharma, S., & Warkentin, M. (2019). Do I really belong?: Impact of employment status on information security policy compliance. Computers & Security, 87, 101397.
Simonsen, K. B. (2017). Does citizenship always further Immigrants’ feeling of belonging to the host nation? A study of policies and public attitudes in 14 Western democracies. Comparative Migration Studies, 5, 1-17.
Simsa, R. (2017). Leaving emergency management in the refugee crisis to civil society? The case of Austria. Journal of Applied Security Research, 12(1), 78-95.
Titko, E., Kurovska, I., Korniienko, P., Balzhyk, I. A., & Stoyatska, G. M. (2021). Military-civil interaction through the prism of human rights protection: the experience of the ECtHR. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 649-666.
Valadez, J. (2018). Deliberative democracy, political legitimacy, and self-determination in multi-cultural societies. Routledge.
Warren, M. E., & Mansbridge, J. (2013). Deliberative negotiation. Negotiating agreement in politics, 86.
Yuliartini, N. P. R., & Mangku, D. G. S. (2020). Legal protection for women victims of trafficking in Indonesia in an international human rights perspective. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1397-1404.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Moderat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Moderat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan © 2023 by Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
