ANALISIS SWOT STRATEGI PEMERINTAH DAERAH KABUPATEN BANDUNG DALAM PENANGANAN KONFLIK HORIZONTAL ORGANISASI MASYARAKAT DI KABUPATEN BANDUNG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v9i2.2868Abstract
Mass or Community Organizations (Ormas) in principle represent an established and healthy democratic life, because the existence of mass organizations is included in the category of freedom of association and assembly for the community. Unfortunately, many Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) are involved in conflicts of interest which lead to open violence, including the Bandung Regency which has a fairly high productivity of CSO establishments. This study uses a SWOT analysis which contains the variables of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, and a qualitative method with a case study approach. The results of the study show that from the aspect of strength, the local government is represented by Kesbangpol as a work unit that has direct contact with Ormas, the first of which is support from "sides" in coaching, namely the TNI and POLRI. There is full control over the distribution of grant funds from the Government of Bandung Regency. Meanwhile, the weaknesses are the minimum number and quality of human resources who intensely accompany CSOs resulting in a lack of oversight, and many CSO leaders do not know the function of Kesbangpol. In fact, in terms of opportunities, the community has intensively used social media so they can carry out surveillance at any time, plus every mass organization has strong militancy, which is useful in terms of program mobilization if the mass organization knows about Kesbangpol's existence. With regard to threats, it is possible for mass organizations to not consider the existence of the Kesbangpol and Regional Government so that conflict escalations between mass organizations are increasing
References
Arfani, Riza Noer. (1996). Demokrasi Indonesia Kontemporer. Jakarta: Raja GrafindoPersada.
Hadiwijoyo. (2012). Negara, Demokrasi, dan Civil Society. Yogyakarta. Graha Ilmu.
Kartono, Kartini, (1998). Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan: Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Koentjaraningrat. (2009). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta: RinekaCipta.
Mangunhardjana. A. M, 1986, Pembinaan: Arti dan Metodenya, Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
Moleong, L.J. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung:PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Noer Arfani, Riza. (1996). Demokrasi Indonesia Kontemporer. PT Raja Grafindo Persada: Jakarta.
Salusu, J. (2006). Pengambilan Keputusan Stratejik, Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utamna.
Salusu, J. (1996). Pengambilan Keputusan Strategik untuk OrganisasiPublik an Organisasi non Profit. Jakarta : PT Grasindo
Sj. Sumarto, Hetifah. (2009). Inovasi, Partisipasi dan Good Governance: Prakarsa Inovasi dan partisipatif di Indonesia. Yayasan Obor: Jakarta.
Sugiyono. (2005). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Winardi, J. (2003). Entrepreneur Dan Entrepreneurship. Jakarta : Prenada Media.
Perundang-undangan:
Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2013 tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan,
UU No. 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Moderat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Moderat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan © 2023 by Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0