POLA INTERAKSI SOSIAL MASYARAKAT PADA ORGANISASI ISLAM NAHDLATUL ULAMA DAN MUHAMMADIYAH

Authors

  • Silvy Maulidia Izqi Prodi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, Universitas Pancasakti Tegal, Tegal, Indonesia
  • Subiyanto Prodi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, Universitas Pancasakti Tegal, Tegal, Indonesia
  • R. Samidi Prodi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, Universitas Pancasakti Tegal, Tegal, Indonesia
  • Wahyu Jati Kusuma Prodi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, Universitas Pancasakti Tegal, Tegal, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v10i4.4414

Keywords:

Interaksi Sosial, Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah

Abstract

This research aims at the pattern of community social interaction that exists between the Islamic organizations Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah in Karangdawa village, Margasari district, Tegal district. This research uses a qualitative research method that uses a field approach (field research) and this research design uses a descriptive design. Data collection techniques use observation, interviews and documentation. The results of this research are 1) the Islamic organizations Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah in Karangdawa village which are structured and clear regarding their composition or order as evidenced by the running of the programs. 2) the pattern of social interaction of the people from the Islamic organization Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah in Karangdawa village can be seen in everyday life, the interaction between the two is also seen when they are synergizing and working together in society, thus the social interaction between them forms a social process that is closer and then brings relationships. harmony in Karangdawa village. 3) The interaction of the two organizations is also influenced by driving factors including imitation, suggestion, identification, sympathy and self-introspection. And then the factors inhibiting social interaction are competition, contradiction and conflict.

References

Asfiyah, W. (2016). Interaksi Warga Nahdlatul Ulama dan Muhammadiyah Dalam Menjaga kerukunan di desa Mojopuro Wetan Kecamatan Bungah Kabupaten Gresik. Kajian Moral da Kewarganegaraan, 2(4).

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Choiri, U. S. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif di Bidang Pendidikan . Ponorogo: CV. NATA KARYA.

Ehwanudin, E. (2016). Tokoh Proklamator Nahdlatul ulama (Studi Historis berdiriya Jam'iyyah Nahdlatul ulama). Fikri: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya, 1(2), 447-468.

Hamdan. (2009). Paradigma pendidikan muhammadiyah, paradigma baru pendidikan muhammadiyah (Cet. I). Jogyakarta: Ruzz Media

Harahap, N. (2020). Penelitian Kualitatif. Medan: Wal ashri Publishing.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif: buku sumber tentang metodemetode baru. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Muslim, A. (2013). Interaksi sosial dalam masyarakat multietnis. Jurnal diskursus islam, 1(3) 483-494.

Rofiah, K. (2016). Dinamika Relasi Muhammadiyah dan NU Dalam Perspektif Teori Konflik Fungsional Lewis A. Coser. Kalam, 10(2), 469-490.

Rohmah, U. (2016). Interaksi Sosial Warga NU dan Muhammadiyah Studi Kasus di Desa Punduhsari. (Kajian Manajemen dan Otonomi Daerah), 1(2)

Salik, M. (2020). "Nahdlatul Ulama dan gagasan moderasi Islam". Malang: PT Literindo Berkah Jaya.

Soekanto, Soerjono. 2001. Sosiologi: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2003). Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sugiyono. (2005). Memahami Penelitian Kualitaif. Bandung: ALFABET.

Sujarwanto, I. (2012). Interaksi sosial antar umat beragama (studi kasus pada masyarakat Karangmalang Kedungbanteng Kabupaten Tegal. Journal Of Educational Social Studies, 1(2).

Walgito, Bimo. (2003). Psikologi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Published

2024-11-28

How to Cite

Silvy Maulidia Izqi, Subiyanto, R. Samidi, & , W. J. K. (2024). POLA INTERAKSI SOSIAL MASYARAKAT PADA ORGANISASI ISLAM NAHDLATUL ULAMA DAN MUHAMMADIYAH. Moderat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 10(4), 741–748. https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v10i4.4414