UPAYA PEMERINTAH MENGELOLA TEKANAN PUBLIK: ANALISIS RESPON PEMERINTAH ATAS TUNTUTAN 17+8 PASCA DEMONSTRASI AGUSTUS 2025

Authors

  • Henny Sulistiawati Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Merina Afrilia Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v12i1.5769

Keywords:

Public Pressure, Demonstrations, Public Management, Responsiveness, Accountability

Abstract

Public pressure is an inherent feature of modern democratic governance and represents a managerial challenge for state institutions. This article analyzes the public management responses of the government and the House of Representatives (DPR) to the 17+8 demands following the major demonstrations of August 2025 in Indonesia. The study employs a qualitative approach with a document-based case study design, drawing on demand documents, official government and parliamentary statements, and national media reports. The findings reveal three main patterns of state response: communication response, policy response, and coordinative response. Communication responses dominated the initial phase, aiming to maintain stability and legitimacy, yet tended to be normative and defensive. Policy responses were selective and short-term, reflecting crisis management rather than structural reform. Meanwhile, coordinative responses remained ad hoc and lacked institutional consolidation. Analysis through the lenses of public responsiveness, accountability, and policy management indicates that the state was procedurally responsive in the early phase, but not yet optimal in integrating public pressure into a coherent and sustainable policy management cycle. Theoretically, this study contributes to public management scholarship by positioning public demonstrations as managerial challenges within democratic governance. Practically, it offers insights for policymakers to design more integrated, substantive, and sustainable responses to public pressure.

References

Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Southeast Asia’s Troubling Elections: Nondemocratic Pluralism in Indonesia. Journal of Democracy, 30(4), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0055

Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., Schillemans, T., Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & Goodin, R. E. (2014). Public Accountability. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641253.013.0012

Dahl, R. A., Dahl, & Press, Y. U. (1998). On Democracy. Yale University Press.

Denhardt, J. V, & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315699356

Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy, 3rd Edition. Stanford University Press.

Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1995). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press.

Janati, F. (2025). DPR Jawab Tuntutan 17+8 Rakyat, Umumkan 6 Poin Keputusan. Kompas. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2025/09/05/18290261/dpr-jawab-tuntutan-178-rakyat-umumkan-6-poin-keputusan?page=all

Kim, S. (2006). Public service motivation and organizational citizenship behavior in Korea. International Journal of Manpower, 27(8), 722–740. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720610713521

Nurmandi, A., Muhammad Lutfi, Sumardi, S., & Zuly Qodir. (2021). Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Melalui Pendekatan Model Demokrasi pada Era Otonomi Daerah. Journal of Government Insight, 1(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.47030/jgi.v1i1.253

Paskarina, C. (2020). Digital Activism and Democracy in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal Political Research, 01(December), 43–58.

Patabang, V. (2025). 17+8 Tuntutan Rakyat: Kajian Hukum atas Gerakan Sosial dan Partisipasi Politik Generasi Milenial-Gen Z dalam Menyuarakan Hak Konstitusional. CV. Kurnia Grup, Vol. 2 No.

Patimah, A., Mustaqim, A., & Damayanti, S. (2025). KRISIS KEPERCAYAAN PUBLIK TERHADAP APARAT PENEGAK HUKUM PADA AKSI DEMONSTRASI AGUSTUS 2025. SOSEBI: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa Ilmu Sosial Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, 5, 175–193. https://doi.org/10.21274/sosebi.v5i2.11537

Salsabila, K. A., Anastasya, N., Saritza, Z., Simanjuntak, A. C., Nafis, M., Situmorang, K. R., Manurung, R., Annisa, S., & Info, A. (2025). 17+8 TUNTUTAN RAKYAT: KRISIS KEPERCAYAAN DAN REFORMASI DPR PADA ERA PRESIDEN PRABOWO. JIIC : Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 2(9), 16686–16695.

Shabrina, D. (2025). Apa Saja Tuntutan Rakyat 17+8 yang Sudah dan Belum Terpenuhi? Tempo. https://www.tempo.co/politik/apa-saja-tuntutan-rakyat-17-8-yang-sudah-dan-belum-terpenuhi--2067332

Virgynia, I., Sinaga, S., & Hulwanullah, H. (2025). Dilema Birokrasi Penegakan Hukum di Era Digital: Konflik Due Process of Law dan Tekanan Opini Publik dalam Kebijakan Polri. Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik, 10(4), 932–947.

Wahyudi, F. S. (2025). Komunikasi Pejabat Publik di Tengah Krisis: Analisis Gaya Bicara dan Dampaknya pada Aksi Demo 29–31 Agustus 2025. Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research, 3(9), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.62504/jimr1362

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Sulistiawati, H., & Afrilia, M. (2026). UPAYA PEMERINTAH MENGELOLA TEKANAN PUBLIK: ANALISIS RESPON PEMERINTAH ATAS TUNTUTAN 17+8 PASCA DEMONSTRASI AGUSTUS 2025. Moderat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 12(1), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v12i1.5769