EFEKTIVITAS PENGGUNAAN TERAVERSA UNIVERSITAS JENDERAL SOEDIRMAN PURWOKERTO DI DALAM INOVASI KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v11i4.4668Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas penggunaan Teraversa Unsoed Purwokerto dalam inovasi kebijakan publik. Teraversa merupakan platform yang mengintegrasikan kolaborasi antara akademisi, pemerintah, dan masyarakat untuk merumuskan kebijakan yang responsif terhadap kebutuhan masyarakat. Dengan demikian, inisiatif ini berusaha menciptakan sistem kebijakan yang lebih inklusif, transparan, dan akuntabel. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif deskriptif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi lapangan, dan dokumentasi resmi terkait proses pengambilan keputusan dan implementasi kebijakan di wilayah setempat. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan metode thematic analysis untuk mengidentifikasi tema-tema dominan yang terkait dengan efektivitas Teraversa dalam konteks inovasi kebijakan publik.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Teraversa telah berperan signifikan dalam meningkatkan kualitas layanan publik melalui pengembangan kebijakan yang inovatif. Berdasarkan temuan, Teraversa berhasil meningkatkan partisipasi masyarakat dalam proses pengambilan keputusan, memfasilitasi komunikasi lintas-sektoral, dan mempromosikan praktek good governance. Selain itu, inisiatif ini juga telah mengurangi birokratisisme dan meningkatkan efisiensi dalam penyampaian layanan publik.
Namun, tantangan seperti sosialisasi kebijakan dan pengembangan kapasitas sumber daya manusia masih perlu diatasi agar hasil inovasi dapat dirasakan secara optimal oleh masyarakat. Misalnya, adanya resistensi awal dari kalangan pemerintah lokal maupun masyarakat yang belum sepenuhnya memahami manfaat dari kegiatan kolaboratif ini. Demikian pula, perlunya pelatihan intensif bagi anggota tim Teraversa
guna meningkatkan kompetensinya dalam merancang dan mengimplemenasikan kebijakan yang kompleks.
Penelitian ini efektivitas penggunaan Teraversa Unsoed Purwokerto dalam inovasi kebijakan publik. Teraversa adalah platform yang bercerita tentang sejarawan, pemerintah, dan masyarakat untuk merumuskan kebijakan responsif terhadap kebutuhan masyarakat. Metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif dengan pengumpulan data melalui wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi proses pengambilan keputusan dan pelaksanaan kebijakan. Analisis data menggunakan analisis tematik untuk mengidentifikasi tema utama. Hasilnya menunjukkan Teraversa berperan penting dalam meningkatkan kualitas layanan publik dengan mengembangkan kebijakan inovatif. Teraversa meningkatkan partisipasi masyarakat, memfasilitasi komunikasi lintas-sektoral, dan mendorong tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik. Selain itu, inisiatif ini mengurangi birokrasi dan meningkatkan efisiensi layanan. Tantangan yang dihadapi meliputi sosialisasi kebijakan dan pengembangan kapasitas sumber daya manusia, termasuk resistensi awal dari pemerintah lokal dan masyarakat yang belum memahami manfaatnya. Pelatihan intensif diperlukan untuk meningkatkan kompetensi tim Teraversa dalam merancang dan mengimplementasikan kebijakan kompleks. Disimpulkan bahwa Teraversa memiliki potensi besar dalam mendukung inovasi kebijakan publik dengan kebutuhan implementasi strategi yang lebih baik dan penguatan kemitraan dengan berbagai pihak serta evaluasi berkala untuk meningkatkan efektivitas kebijakan.
Referensi
Albury, D. (2005). Fostering innovation in public services. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 51–56.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organisational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley.
Ariely, D. (2010). Why businesses don’t experiment. Harvard Business Review, 88(4), 34.
Bardach, E. (1976). Policy termination as a political process. Policy Sciences, 7, 123–131. (1976).
Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation. Policy Press.
Baumard, P., & Starbuck, W. (2005). Learning from failures: Why it may not happen. Long Range Planning, 38, 281–298.
Benington, J., & Moore, M. (2011). Public value: Theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bessant, J. (2005). Enabling continuous and discontinuous innovation. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 35–42.
Birkinshaw, J., & Haas, M. (2016). Increase your return on failure. Harvard Business Review, 94(5), 88–93.
Borins, S. (2008). Innovations in government. Brookings Institution Press.
Borins, S. (2014). The persistence of innovation. Brookings Institution Press.
Bovaird, T., & Quirk, B. (2017). Resilience in public administration: moving from risk avoidance to assuring public policy outcomes. In T. Klassen,
Cepiku, & T. Lah (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of global public policy and administration. Routledge.
Bozeman, B., & Bretschneider, S. (1994). The publicness puzzle in organizational theory: a test of alternative explanations of differences between public and private organizations. Journal of Public Administration Theory and Research, 4, 197–223.
Brown, L., & Osborne, S. (2013). Risk and Innovation. Public Management Review, 15(2), 186–208.
Cannon, M., & Edmondson, A. (2005). Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently): How great organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve. Long Range Planning, 38, 299–319.
Cândido, C. J. F., & Santos, S. P. (2015). Strategy implementation: What is the failure rate? Journal of Management & Organization, 21(2), 237–262.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation. Harvard Business School Press.
Cooper, R. (1988). The new product process: A decision-making guide for management. Journal of Marketing Management, 3(3), 238–255.
Danneels, E., & Vestal, A. (2020). Normalizing vs. analyzing: Drawing the lessons from failure to enhance firm innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(1), 1–18.
David, M. (2017). Moving beyond the heuristic of creative destruction: targeting exnovation with policy mixes for energy transitions. Energy Research and Social Science, 33, 138–146.
David, M. (2018). Exnovation as a necessary factor in successful energy transitions. In D. Davidson, & M. Gross (Eds.), Oxford handbook of energy and society. Oxford University Press.
De Vries, H., Bekkers, S., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166.
Edmondson, A. (2011). Strategies for learning from failure. Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 48–55.
Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., & Nelson R. (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Farson, R., & Keyes, R. (2002). The failure-tolerant leader. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 64–71.
Fuglsang, L. (2010). Bricolage and invisible innovation in public service innovation. Journal of Innovation Economics and Management, 1(5), 67–87.
Fuglsang, L., & Møller, J. (2020). Bridging public and private innovation patterns. In D. Billis, & C. Rochester (Eds.), Handbook on hybrid organizations. Edward Elgar.
Golden, O. (1997). Innovation in public sector human services programs: The implications of innovation by ‘groping along’. In A. Altschuler, & R. Behn (Eds.), Innovation in American government. Brookings Institution Press.
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kryiakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629.
Harford, T. (2011). Adapt: why success always starts with failure. Little, Brown.
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34.
Hartley, J. (2013). Public and private features of innovation. In S. Osborne, & L. Brown (Eds.), Sage handbook of innovation in public services. Sage.
Hartley, J., & Rashman, L. (2007). How is knowledge transferred between organizations involved in change? In M. Wallace, M. Fertig, & E.
Schneller (Eds.), Managing change in the public services. Blackwell.
Hartley, J., & Rashman, L. (2018). Innovation and learning in a national programme of public service reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 231–248.
Heyen, D.-A., Hermwille, L., & Wehnert, T. (2017). Out of the comfort zone! Governing the exnovation of unsustainable technologies and practices. Gaia 26(4), 326-331.
Hughes, M. (2011). Do 70 per cent of all organizational change initiatives really fail? Journal of Change Management, 11(4), 451–464.
Jordan, S. (2014). The innovation imperative: An analysis of the ethics of the imperative to innovate in public sector service delivery. Public Management Review, 16(1), 67–89.
Kiefer, T., Hartley, J., Conway, N., & Briner, R. (2015). Feeling the squeeze: The experience of ongoing change and innovation in UK public sector organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25 (4), 1279–1305.
Kimberly, J. (1981). Managerial innovation. In P. Nystrom, & W. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design (pp. 84–104). Oxford University Press.
Kimberly, J., & Evanisko, M. (1981). Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 689–713.
Lodge, M. (2009). The public management of risk: The case for deliberating among worldviews. Review of Policy Research, 26, 4.
Lynn, L. (1997). ‘Innovation and the public interest: insights from the private sector. In A. Altshuler, & R. Behn (Eds.), Innovation in American government (pp. 83–103). Brookings Institution Press.
McGrath, R. (1999). Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 13–30.
McGrath, R. (2010). Are you squandering your intelligent failures. Harvard Business Review, 26 March [Online]. Available at: https://hbr.org/2010/ 03/are-you-squandering-your-intel.html (Accessed 26 February 2021.).
McGrath, R. G. (2017). There are better ways to fail. Ideas & Insights. Available at: http://www8.gsb.columbia.edu/articles/ideas-work/there-are-better-ways-fail?region=bodycopy (Accessed 26 February 2021.).
Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2020). The dark side of public innovation. Public Performance & Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15309576.2020.1782954.
Molnar, A., Whelan, C., & Boyle, P. J. (2018). Securing the Brisbane 2014 G20 in the wake of the Toronto 2010 G20: ‘Failure-inspired’ learning in public order policing. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(1), 107–125.
Moran, M. (2003). The British regulatory state: High modernism and hyperinnovation. Oxford University Press.
Muoio, R., Wolcott, L., & Seigel, H. M. (1995). A win-win situation: The pilot program. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 26(5), 230–233.
Osborne, S., Brandsen, T., Mele, V., Nemec, J., van Genugten, M., & Flemig,. (2020). Risking innovation. Understanding risk and public service innovation—evidence from a four-nation study. Public Money & Management, 40(1), 52–62.
Osborne, S., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery: The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89(4), 1355–1350.
Osborne, S., & Brown, K. (2005). Managing change and innovation in public service organizations. Routledge.
Rashman, L., Downe, J., & Hartley, J. (2005). Knowledge creation and transfer in the Beacon Scheme: Improving services through sharing good practice. Local Government Studies, 31(5), 683–700.
Renn, O. (2008). Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan.
Roberts, N. C., & King, P. J. (1996). Transforming public policy. Jossey-Bass.
Rodriguez, H., Henke, R., Bibi, S., Ramsay, P., & Shortell, S. (2016). The exnovation of chronic care management processes by physician organizations. The Milbank Quarterly, 94(3), 626–653.
Schein, E. (1997). Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Shergold, P. (2015). Learning from failure: Why large government policies have gone so badly wrong in the past and how the chances of success in the future can be improved. Report. Australian Public Service Commission.
Sitkin, S. B. (1992). Learning through failure: the strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 231–266.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43(8), 842–868.
Staw, B. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior And Human Performance. 16, 27–44.
Sturdy, A., & Grey, C. (2003). Beneath and beyond organizational change management: exploring alternatives. Organization, 10(4), 651–662.
Taleb, N. N. (2008). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. Penguin.
Thomke, S., & Manzi, J. (2014). The discipline of business experimentation. Harvard Business Review, 92(12), 70–79.
Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2018). Managing innovation. Wiley.
Tomkins, L., Hartley, J., & Bristow, A. (2020). Asymmetries of leadership: Agency, response and reason. Leadership, 16(1), 87–106.
Van de Ven, A., Angle, H., & Poole, M. (2000). Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies. Oxford University Press.
Vincent, J. (1996). Managing risk in public services: A review of the international literature. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(2), 57–64.
Windrum, P., & Koch, P. (2008). Innovation in public sector services: Entrepreneurship, creativity and management. Edward Elgar.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Nurrekta Yuristrianti, Imam Maulana Yusuf, Ali Rokhman
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Moderat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan © 2023 by Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
